What is Abnormal Heat and Where are We Being Deceived?

If we talk or read in the media about 'global warming', it refers to an increase in average temperatures by a conditional degree or two, on a planetary scale.

Regarding the understanding/misunderstanding of such information, there is even a recent Russian-speaking meme: 'average temperature in the hospital.'

By slightly rephrasing it, the idea is that patients with fever have a temperature above +42 degrees, while 'patients' in the morgue refrigerator have a temperature of 0 degrees. Thus, it turns out that there are no particularly severe patients in the hospital – the average temperature of the patients is normal, 36.6 degrees.

Attention, question: Is such a statistical manipulation as the above-described 'average hospital temperature' a reason to doubt the importance of measuring temperature in principle?

Can the patient's temperature still be considered an important diagnostic sign, or should temperature measurement and thermometers be 'canceled'?

The question is: None of us can personally be an expert on all issues. The ocean of modern human knowledge is simply enormous! And what to do? Where and whom can we trust, and what are the limits of such trust?

In fact, this is probably one of the most important questions now – the question of the limits of trust. And not only when talking about the so-called 'global warming', but also in many other IMPORTANT questions.

I personally have to admit that society has enough reasons not to trust not only politicians, government officials, or the mass media, but also the 'scientific community'. Personally, time after time, I am increasingly convinced that the existing social systems of states, so to speak, are seriously sick.

I myself, in principle, am in a rather skeptical position. Simply put, I often say: We are being lied to beyond belief! And yet, I believe that too much, let's say, 'radical skepticism' goes too far. Like all things radical, probably.

I will try to illustrate with specific examples. That will be the most accessible and understandable. Just my opinion.

FIRST.

Saying that 'no warming exists, we are being lied to' simply because you see cold weather outside the window is foolishness. It's just a situational reaction, with an emotional nature that cannot replace analytical thinking.

Accordingly, if a so-called 'thinker's' 'horizon' is limited to 'I'm warm – I'm cold', there's nothing to discuss. Let's say: I try to articulate my thoughts as simply as possible and avoid using narrowly specialized terms. But at least common sense and minimal social experience are necessary to understand what I am talking about.

SECOND.

We are dealing with lies from transnational commercial corporations (TNCs) in collaboration with state officials.

I think that this is actually two kinds of lies, conscious and unintentional, which together become that hellish mixture that erodes the very structure of our societies.

On the one hand, masses of people are being consciously lied to, trying to make a profit from them. The owner of a commercial company pays a 'kickback' for permission to cut down the Ancient Forest. A government official, for a bribe, processes the necessary documents. A so-called 'scientist' provides a so-called 'scientific' justification for why the Ancient Forest not only can but must be urgently cut down for the benefit of nature. It is all simple and clear: we are dealing with conscious liars. Often ready to do anything for personal enrichment.

But, on the other hand, there is even more unintentional lying. People lie to themselves. Or people do not understand anything about the issue but are in power. Conscious lying multiplied by mass incompetence in the management system already gives us the flawed social system we see.

THIRD.

In fact, no one needs to falsify the fact of rising average temperatures. It's unlikely possible either. Manipulation is carried out by politicians at the level of explaining the reasons for this fact.

Under the pretext of 'fighting to save the planet', POLITICAL topics are being pushed:

1. Destruction of some agricultural sectors and replacing them with others. With a clear aim for further monopolization of an already extremely monopolized industrial agriculture.

2. Introduction of a 'carbon tax'. That is, they intend, in simple terms, to take money under a plausible pretext in favor of an already ultra-rich minority.

3. Destruction of the existing energy sector, substituting it with so-called 'green energy'. Which has dubious relation to 'saving the planet', while the profits of already ultra-rich super-monopolists are fairly obvious.

4. Geoengineering/climate engineering is being actively promoted. Again – in the interests of the ultra-rich. With questionable potential benefits for people or the Planet’s Biosphere, but not only with obvious vested interests of 'billionaire-philanthropists', but also with colossal risks from using such technologies. And I am not the only one who understands this. And this understanding wasn't born yesterday! The movie 'Snowpiercer', if you haven’t watched it – is an allegory on just that. An attempt as early as 2013 to reach out to people through the artistic capabilities of cinema.

I just express my opinion. Based on the analysis of information available to me. To tell this in detail and with arguments requires many pages. A book is needed. But such books, and such research exist. As does a number of honest scientists who state these things much better than I can.

It’s no revelation for anyone who is even slightly interested in the topic that Ancient Forests play a role in climate regulation. This is well known, and the number of persuasive evidence is growing. It would seem that untouched natural ecosystems should be taken under full and unconditional protection! But no: both state authorities and international structures continue to rush towards monopoly and profit under the guise of a 'green agenda'.

I also come to my conclusions not directly, not by myself, as naturalists did two hundred years ago. I, like all of us, turn to the materials of researchers and scientists. And to assume that all are entirely corrupt and only lie for money is silly. There are enough honest specialists! I only try, as best as I can, to popularize REAL scientific knowledge and conclusions.

My PERSONAL brief conclusions about 'global warming'.

- The increase in temperatures is real.

- The only 100% reliable fact is the stabilizing influence of Ancient Forests on the climate. We are destroying the forests — the Biosphere cannot defend itself against climate changes.

- Human influence on the climate exists, but the extent of this influence is not precisely defined. It is clear that this is one of many factors. Natural climatic cycles or solar activity cycles with their influence on Earth must also be evaluated in combination with the anthropogenic factor.

- We see climate chaos as a result of rising average temperatures on the planet and human intervention. Meteorologists and climatologists have said and forecasted this before – there's nothing unexpected.

- I assume that people highly overvalue themselves. And overestimate their own influence on Earth. I still hope that planet Earth is a self-regulating system, whose ability to self-regulate people underestimate.

Ancient forests, which urgently need protection and removal of any human economic activities from their territories, regulate the climate. They ensure the operation of the biotic pump (biotic regulation of atmospheric moisture) by drawing moisture inside the continent from the ocean! This is how the Biosphere breathes.

Abnormal heat and global climate changes have occurred on the planet before! It's true. 

Only then could the Biosphere defend itself, the planet's lungs were whole and could adapt to climate changes.

Today, the situation is that before another climate change on the planet, before abnormal solar activity, people have disrupted Earth’s breathing. They suppressed the planet’s immune system.

We see natural climate rhythms, aggravated and accelerated by human activity. At the same time, we observe increased solar activity and the inability of the Biosphere to adapt to disasters, the inability to defend against them.

And in spite of all this, states and TNCs continue to 'play' with the climate, investing billions of dollars in 'climate management' and creating climate weapons. Instead of investing these same billions in protecting the Ancient Forest and giving the Planet’s Biosphere a chance to protect itself during global cataclysms.

The Ancient Forest saves itself, which means it saves all of us. Its immune system is our immune system too.

© PAVEL PASHKOV